|
1
|
- Natallie Rochester
- Services Analyst
- Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery
- nrochester@crnm.org/ www.crnm.org
|
|
2
|
- Caribbean SVEs in the WTO: Antigua & Barbuda, Barbados, Belize,
Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, St.
Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent & the Grenadines,
Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago
- ** (The Bahamas is in the process of WTO Accession)
- Coordinated approach to AfT to support CARICOM Regional Integration
agenda
- Wider Caribbean approach at CARIFORUM-EPA level
- General CARIFORUM coordination includes Cuba
|
|
3
|
- Mix of high income (ATG, BHS, BRB,TTO), upper middle (BLZ,CUB,DMA, GRD,
JAM,KNA,LCA, VCT), lower middle (DR,GUY), low income/LDC (HTI) (World
Bank April 2009)
- High trade openness
- Low & stagnant GDP Growth rates
- Highly indebted
- Largely dependent on services, esp. tourism (except Guyana, TT, DR,
Haiti)
- Narrow range of goods exports
- Mainly small island states except Belize, Guyana, Suriname which are
low-lying coastal
|
|
4
|
- World Trade Organisation (The Bahamas in the process of accession)
- Several Caribbean countries are non-resident (Belize, Guyana, Suriname)
- OECS represented at the regional
level in Geneva
- CARIFORUM-EC EPA
- CARICOM FTA with Costa Rica cover services; others goods only - Cuba,
Colombia, Venezuela
- CARICOM to start negotiations with Canada in 2009
- CARICOM ongoing discussion with US on trade & investment
- DR has FTAs with US (very ambitious), Panama, and negotiating with
Canada since October 2007
- Intra-regional trade: CARICOM Single Market and Economy, CARICOM-DR FTA,
CARICOM-Cuba
|
|
5
|
- Similar effort under the FTAA Hemispheric Cooperation Programme –
preparation for &
participation in negotiations, implementation of trade agreements
- Coordination at the WTO level (ACP, SVEs, ad hoc Groups for specific
negotiations)
- Meetings of CARICOM, CARIFORUM, ACS,OECS
- Technical Working Groups on Development & Specific Trade Disciplines
- National level development plans, export strategies etc.
- Industry level analysis and advocacy
|
|
6
|
- Aid for Trade should aim to help developing countries, particularly
LDCs, to build the supply-side
capacity and trade-related infrastructure that they need to
assist them to implement and benefit from WTO Agreements and more
broadly to expand their trade
- The Director-General was invited
“to consult with Members as well as with the IMF and World Bank,
relevant international organisations and the regional development banks
with a view to reporting to the General Council on appropriate
mechanisms to secure additional financial resources for Aid for Trade,
where appropriate through grants and concessional loans”. (WTO Hong Kong
Ministerial Declaration, December 2005)
- Interventions that improve capacity to benefit from trade expansion and
integration into the world economy
(Joint WTO/IDB/OECD Background Paper on Aid for Trade,
WT/COMTD/AFT/W/13, June 2009)
|
|
7
|
- Circulated December 2008 by the IDB
- 12 options for AfT priorities under the broad headings (i) trade policy
and regulation (ii) economic infrastructure (iii) building productive
capacity (iv) other priorities
- 14 Caribbean countries responded
- Responses sent to the WTO and OECD
- Countries view the responses as indicative
- Second Global Review of AfT scheduled for July 6-7, 2009 , Geneva
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Trade policy and regulations
- Analysis, development, negotiations & facilitation
- Implementation of Trade Agreements
- Building productive capacity
- Private Sector Development
- Competitiveness
- Network Infrastructure
- Trade related infrastructure (Transportation)
- Infrastructure networks
- Other
- Regional Integration and Cooperation
- Adjustment Costs of Trade Liberalisation
|
|
10
|
- Trade policy and regulations
- Analysis, development, negotiations & facilitation
- Impact assessment of possible negotiating positions
- Improve data collection systems
- Business facilitation e.g market intelligence, business to business
matching
- Implementation of Trade Agreements
- Doha Round obligations (new & clarification of existing rules) –
services, fisheries subsidies disciplines, Tariff liberalisation
(NAMA, Agriculture), IP, trade remedies (new legislation,
institutions, notification requirements etc)
- Coherence with EPA Implementation agenda
- Building productive capacity
- Private Sector Development /Competitiveness
- small scale/artisanal fishing - assistance in improving efficiency in
harvesting, processing and marketing
- value chain analysis for agro products as a basis for improving value
addition returns to producers for domestic, regional and global
markets
- diversification of the tourism product
- Better domestic regulation – clear registration, certification
procedures
|
|
11
|
- Network Infrastructure
- Trade related infrastructure (Transportation)
- Needed to facilitate increased productive capacity
- Must be integrated and multi-modal
- Infrastructure networks
- E-commerce platforms & training in their use
- Other
- Regional Integration and Cooperation
- Harmonisation of regimes for improved efficiency
- Adjustment Costs of Trade Liberalisation
- Adjustment to preference erosion
- Adjustment to new tariff
- Implementation of new rules on trade & trade-related issues
|
|
12
|
- Reduce need for new loans for increasing trade capacity
- Improve regulatory framework for trade through trade ‘mainstreaming’
- Support for regional integration – political and economic
- Improve systems needed for intra-regional trade
- Increase developing country participation in the global economy through
increased trade capacity
- Mitigate debt effect by increasing income from trade
|
|
13
|
- Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Vincent
& Grenadines, and Cuba) received more than 80 per cent of their
aid in productive capacity building (listed in declining order)
- St. Lucia, Guyana, Suriname, Dominican Republic, and Grenada received
50-70 per cent in productive capacity building.
- Haiti, Jamaica, and Dominica received more AFT for economic
infrastructure than productive capacity building
- (Source: WTO, WT/COMTD/AFT/W/13,
based on OECD Creditor Reporting System)
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Caribbean responses:
- Better predictability of AfT
funding
- Stronger donor focus on local
capacity development
- Greater input in design of
interventions
|
|
16
|
- Definitional issues have not really been resolved, but analysis on
general TRA being credited to AfT process & used as basis for AfT
Actions
- WTO/OECD targeting lower income & LDC, most Caribbean countries
outside of these categories on paper but need assistance
- Not clear what new funds/resources will be committed – futile to
repackage, countries losing confidence in partners
- Responses to the questionnaires should be treated as indicative and not
a static set of needs; more in-country consultations seem to be needed
- Risk that needs are being tailored to suit donor programmes
|
|
17
|
- Terms of AfT as a distinct concept needs to be defined
- Caribbean countries are vulnerable and require trade-related assistance
under AfT
- Most Caribbean countries are not the primary target beneficiaries for
AfT
- Priority areas are complementary & need concurrent efforts
- Caribbean countries should lead in defining specific needs &
activities & getting stakeholder support for these
- Caribbean interaction with donors on AfT needs harmonisation to avoid
overlap from different levels of intra-Caribbean coordination &
inefficient use of resources
|
|
18
|
- Seek clear commitment to new resources for AfT for the Caribbean for
specific types of activities
- Conduct value chain analysis to assess opportunities in the global
market
- Identify specific priority sectors and projects for a regional ‘Roadmap’
- Institute enabling policies for priority sectors
- Compare national approaches, experience sharing e.g. developing
legislation
- Monitor donor assistance and drive donor coordination
- Ensure effectiveness of interventions through: (i) Feasibility
assessment (ii) Timeliness of execution
- Monitor trade trends &
progress and impact of interventions at the Caribbean level
|